By Suleiman Abubakar
The recent suspension of Dr. Margaret Itake Elayo’s swearing-in as a commissioner in Nasarawa State has sparked widespread concern and speculation. Given her outstanding performance in her previous role, this development raises pressing questions about transparency, fairness, and the criteria used in the selection of commissioners.
Investigations have revealed that Dr. Elayo was ranked as the best-performing commissioner in the Humanitarian Services and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) sector before the dissolution of the state executive council. Her tenure was marked by dedication, efficiency, and impactful policies that improved the lives of many vulnerable individuals. Given these achievements, it is both puzzling and alarming that she has been sidelined during the reconstitution of the new cabinet.
The lack of a clear explanation from the government has left room for widespread speculation. Could political interference be at play? Are there vested interests working against her reappointment? Or is this an issue of gender bias, where competent female leaders are unfairly excluded despite their track record of excellence? These are critical questions that demand answers.
It is essential to emphasize that governance should be rooted in merit, competence, and fairness. When a government disregards performance in favor of other considerations, it risks undermining public confidence in its leadership. Dr. Elayo’s exclusion, if not properly addressed, may send a discouraging message to other dedicated public servants: that hard work and effectiveness do not guarantee continuity in service.
Furthermore, this situation raises concerns about the broader issue of transparency in governance. If there are legitimate reasons for her suspension, the government should communicate them openly. Keeping the public in the dark only fuels mistrust and weakens the credibility of the administration. In a democracy, citizens have the right to demand accountability from their leaders, especially when decisions appear arbitrary or unjustified.
As the people of Nasarawa State watch closely, the government must take urgent steps to clarify its position. If Dr. Elayo’s exclusion is due to procedural or administrative reasons, they should be addressed swiftly to ensure fairness. However, if the decision was influenced by political or personal interests, the government risks losing the trust of the people it serves.
The administration of Nasarawa State must uphold equity, transparency, and integrity in governance. Leaders should be selected based on their ability to deliver results, not based on hidden agendas or favoritism. The case of Dr. Margaret Itake Elayo should not be swept under the rug—it is a test of the government’s commitment to justice and good governance.
